Some new issues I got regarding the most controversial exam of the decade CCE 2013.
1) SOME EXTRA ORDINARY BRILLIANT CANDIDATES GOT 180 OUT OF 200 IN CERTAIN OPTINAL PAPERS. WHILE SOME OTHER CANDIDATES GOT ONLY 50-60 MARKS. IF WE CONSIDER ACADEMIC BACKGROUND OF THE CANDIDATES THEN WE FIND THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSION.
HIGH SCORES OBTAINED BY CANDIDATES WITH AVERAGE OR BELOW AVERAGE ACADEMIC BACKGROUND BUT RICH FINANCIAL AND SOCIAL STATUS. NO CANDIDATE WITH POOR ACADEMIC BACKGROUND AND POOR FINANCIAL STATUS COULD SCORE GOOD MARKS. THE POOR CANDIDATES WHO SCORED GOOD MARKS HAVE SOUND ACADEMIC BACKGROUND.
2) WHETHER APSC FOLLOWED ANY WELL ESTABLISHED NORMS IN THE PROCESS OF EVALUATION !
PLEASE DONT GIVE UP HOPE...WE WILL CONTINUE OUR LEGAL BATTLE.